JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 25, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Pedro Antonio Martinez Moreno

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Conocimiento para resolverlo debe ser expreso
Corte Constitucional
  • Inaplicación del precepto constitucional
  • No puede arrogarse competencias para llenar vacíos legislativos
  • Organo aplicador de la Constitución
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Dirime conflictos de competencia entre distintas jurisdicciones
Estado Social De Derecho
  • Posición jurídica del individuo o del funcionario público
8 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de lo actuado en el proceso de tutela promovido por el ciudadano de la referencia contra Cajanal a partir del auto proferido por el Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, toda vez que se ordenó remitir el expediente al citado Tribunal para lo de su competencia y comunicar lo aquí decidido al Juzgado 25 Civil del Circuito de Bogotá y al Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, para los fines legales pertinentes.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar la nulidad de lo actuado en el proceso de tutela promovido por Pedro Antonio Martinez Moreno contra Cajanal, a partir del auto de enero 24 de 2001, proferido por el Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca.
  2. Segundo. Remitir el expediente al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca para lo de su competencia y comunicar lo aqui decidido al Juzgado 25 Civil del Circuito de Bogota y al Tribunal Superior de Bogota, para los fines legales pertinentes.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.